Me and Scott were discussing this earlier.
In the partners event, would you suggest a partner who is the same type of player as yourself? Or total opposite?
Des - Partners events do indeed require a lot of strategy and compromising play in a tournament. You do have to remember that your partner will be playing against the same players every blind change and the table image remains the same for each blind level swap.
I would recommend on players having the same playing style, but you will need an aggressive player to help the team out in the later stages of the tournament. Or you can look for a player who is aggressive from the outset and who can accumulate chips quickly or a player who in the second blind level is adapt at playing deepstack poker (< 6000 stack on average with blinds at 50/100, whilst first partner has 3,000 stack at 25/50). It depends on what your strategy is.
My strategy would be this. TAG partner to play first blind level (hopefully picks up one or two hands and a couple of pots).
I play second blind level, testing players and building chipstack. I spend third blind level watching table - I would advise partner to player Tight passive and maintain chip stack and don't play too many big pots.
I play fourth blind level and start playing any style based on my read of tables and opponents. Generally would be TAG in early and Laggy in latter position.
After that we would have hopefully built up a deep enough stack to play ABC and nitty poker in the later stages of the tournament and we won't have to gamble that much, if that isn't the case I need a partner who is equally aggressive like me and not scared to gamble or bring fold equity into the equation, who can read the play and know what he has to do.
Hope that is good enough answer for you.
When do you feel its a good idea to take a race in a tournament? Early? Midstage? Near the money bubble? Start of FT?
AK it depends on the tournament, my stack, average stack sizes and blind levels. In a $10 tourney with a $1500 start stack and ten minute blinds I don't mind racing early but I try to avoid it.
In the early stages of a tournament I like to keep pots small and play a lot more post flop, but normally passive unless I have a lock hand, minimum requirements for me to get super ag is mid set or top two.
Midstage of tournament is normally ABC poker, all stacks are deep enough that pf all ins are scarce unless you are playing some super agro players. three betting or four betting generally won't get all the chips in the middle but it will invest you in the pot. So unless I'm sitting on AA, KK, QQ I will flat any two or three bets dependant on my reads of players.
Bubble play is interesting - if I am super chip leader and know I am racing I will probably call, but I don't like to call all ins at this stage I prefer to be the aggressor and the table captain and dictating the action.
Late stages of the tournament - again depending on everything above, but by know I am generally quite willing to get it in the middle on a coin flip, also depends on the pay jump for next position.
If my stack ever drops below 10BB then I am jamming the middle everytime I believe I am in a 50/50 to a 60/40 position, heads up. And by that I mean I am willing to gamble on 7,9 suited up against A,K or A,Q even 8,8 and below.