Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby AceLosesKing » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:40 pm

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em Tournament, 25/50 Blinds (9 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

SB (t1428)
BB (t2420)
UTG (t1745)
UTG+1 (t2495)
MP1 (t3025)
Hero (MP2) (t5675)
MP3 (t7543)
CO (t1023)
Button (t3006)

Hero's M: 75.67

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with KImage, AImage
3 folds, Hero bets t151, MP3 raises to t528, 4 folds, Hero calls t377

Flop: (t1131) KImage, KImage, 7Image (2 players)
Hero bets t879, 1 fold

Total pot: t1131

Results:
Hero didn't show KImage, AImage.
Outcome: Hero won t1131

History with villian: He flatted a 3x standard open from an EP player with KK. AQo 3bs, he shoves, doubles.

This is a $24+2 10k gtd btw.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby AceLosesKing » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:55 pm

Oh, I also opened JJ, he flats, I c/c two streets (river checked) on a 9hKc2s 9c 3d board.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby maccatak11 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:00 pm

I always like to lead on these type of boards. I think it is by far the best option. a check/call looks dodgy and a check/raise isn't likely to get his money in the middle either.

Not sure how often you had c-betted in the past, but on that board (which is not really likely to have hit your hand) a lot of people will shove that c-bet with holdings like 88-QQ or even lighter.

I definately think that the flop is the best time to try and get your money in, and by leading you have the best chance of doing it.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby rcon » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:03 pm

no one ever went broke building a pot, and I can't find a compelling reason to check here - particularly in these 24+2 MTTs early on. You're just never going to build a pot by CRing here.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby bennymacca » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm

if you check raise, he will fold TT-JJ, and continue with aces.

if you lead, he continues with random pocket pairs, aces, flush draws, etc etc

leading >>> check-raising.

well played imo
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby AceLosesKing » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:06 am

maccatak11 wrote:Not sure how often you had c-betted in the past, but on that board (which is not really likely to have hit your hand) a lot of people will shove that c-bet with holdings like 88-QQ or even lighter.

I definately think that the flop is the best time to try and get your money in, and by leading you have the best chance of doing it.


this was my thought process during the hand. He never puts me on a King here and shouldn't be folding out most pairs.

Donking out here looks like a smaller pair, to me, anyway.

Cheers guys.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby maccatak11 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:55 am

not sure what his stats were like, but the fact he raised pre, then folded looks like anything from a little pair A9-AQ or perhaps suited connectors.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
AJG
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:07 am
State: SA
888PL Name: .pKoIkNeGr.
Contact:

Re: Tell me there's nothing wrong with this lead...

Postby AJG » Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:08 am

Also, his reraise from the hijack followed by the fold to flop action from you smells abit like a bigstack steal attempt? (but perhaps a bit small) Even though he wasnt that much of a bigstack (esp relative to you) all players after him are less than 1/2 his stack (less in the blinds)...
Especially if you have been quite aggresive prior, which seems likely given your stack at 25/50 (3rd level?), this could likely be his play?
And his reraise leaves him just over 7K, ie odd reraise amount if he actually has TT+, and doesnt hurt too much if it doesnt work. Would he really reraise with a smaller PP? (unless, again, hoping you fold)
Im gonna put him on air. :)
Just putting out a different line of thought
Image ...11.59% of bad beat stories are just misplayed hands ...


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest