Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
- rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
lol, I'm not endorsing the play, but you do see it a lot, particularly at this sort of level.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
trishan wrote:Garth/benny the cunt - what do you think of the range I stove above? I gave the All-in a pretty wide range but is it not wide enough? I gave the guy who flats a pretty tight range - too tight?
I also messed up the EV calcs because there is a sidepot.
i think you can get rid of some of the low quited kings and queens. maybe Q9s and K9s would shove, but i doubt Q6 would.
with the first flatter, i think you can probably drop 66-88 and ATo as well, if this player was aggressive. if they were passive, then leave them in there. if it was me, i would be shoving that whole range bar the very top of it (JJ-AA, AK), because i dont really want to play AQ or 88 multiway, but i definitely wanna race the short stack with these types of hands.
can you re-run that?
AceLosesKing wrote:rcon wrote:and how many times do you see someone limp UTG with AA or KK at this stage of a tourney, waiting for the push so they can double up?
I have no respect for this limp fwiw.
this, if they limp aces there, then good on them, i never do it, and i pay them off if they do. (how about that for a read 1 week out from the GF LOL)
because of that limp though, it makes the range of the caller to the first all in pretty strong.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
exactly this - if it wasn't for this limp, I think the TT of Bacon's might be going in, but you're potentially playing TT 4 way, EWWWWW!bennymacca wrote:because of that limp though, it makes the range of the caller to the first all in pretty strong.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
- trishan
- Posts: 4515
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: nplking
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
Let me have another go at EV calcs lol:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.533% 48.76% 00.77% 435840864 6894450.00 { TT }
Hand 1: 50.467% 49.70% 00.77% 444192924 6894450.00 { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ }
EV = Pr(Calls) * EV(Calls) + Pr(Folds) * EV(Folds)
EV(Call) = Main Pot Equity(Call) * Main Pot - 8622 + Side Pot Equity * Side Pot - 14902
= .35 * 26866 - 8622 + .50* 29804 - 14902
= 781 + 0
= 781
EV(Folds) = .5 * 26866 - 8622
= 4811
It is pretty marginal. If your equity on the sidepot drops below 47% then EV(Call) becomes negative. For example if you assign the range below then you EV(Call) is negative:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.533% 48.76% 00.77% 435840864 6894450.00 { TT }
Hand 1: 50.467% 49.70% 00.77% 444192924 6894450.00 { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ }
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.533% 48.76% 00.77% 435840864 6894450.00 { TT }
Hand 1: 50.467% 49.70% 00.77% 444192924 6894450.00 { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ }
EV = Pr(Calls) * EV(Calls) + Pr(Folds) * EV(Folds)
EV(Call) = Main Pot Equity(Call) * Main Pot - 8622 + Side Pot Equity * Side Pot - 14902
= .35 * 26866 - 8622 + .50* 29804 - 14902
= 781 + 0
= 781
EV(Folds) = .5 * 26866 - 8622
= 4811
It is pretty marginal. If your equity on the sidepot drops below 47% then EV(Call) becomes negative. For example if you assign the range below then you EV(Call) is negative:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.533% 48.76% 00.77% 435840864 6894450.00 { TT }
Hand 1: 50.467% 49.70% 00.77% 444192924 6894450.00 { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ }
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here
- trishan
- Posts: 4515
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: nplking
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
benny the cunt I have been playing around with the ranges you mentioned but on average we have 35% equity on the main pot. We have anywhere between 47% and 56% equity on the sidepot. This is all assuming the UTG folds. If we include him in EV calcs - it can get very nasty because we have two more variables to add:
Pr(UTG calls & SB folds)
Pr(UTG calls & SB calls)
Pr(UTG folds & SB folds)
Pr(UTG folds & SB calls)
Pr(UTG calls & SB folds)
Pr(UTG calls & SB calls)
Pr(UTG folds & SB folds)
Pr(UTG folds & SB calls)
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
trishan wrote:It is pretty marginal. If your equity on the sidepot drops below 47% then EV(Call) becomes negative. For example if you assign the range below then you EV(Call) is negative:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.533% 48.76% 00.77% 435840864 6894450.00 { TT }
Hand 1: 50.467% 49.70% 00.77% 444192924 6894450.00 { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ }
interesting
so its pretty much a flip whichever way you look at it.
if you like to gambool, then shove, if you are a pussy, then fold.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- trishan
- Posts: 4515
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: nplking
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
51,202,782 games 178.547 secs 286,774 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 25.273% 24.00% 01.27% 12290568 649824.33 { TT }
Hand 1: 28.173% 26.02% 02.15% 13324749 1100913.75 { 99+, ATs+, AJo+ }
Hand 2: 28.170% 26.02% 02.15% 13323594 1100309.42 { 99+, ATs+, AJo+ }
Hand 3: 18.384% 17.30% 01.09% 8857547 555711.25 { 55+, A6s+, K7s+, QTs+, Q7s, A8o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
---
51,202,782 games 178.547 secs 286,774 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 25.273% 24.00% 01.27% 12290568 649824.33 { TT }
Hand 1: 28.173% 26.02% 02.15% 13324749 1100913.75 { 99+, ATs+, AJo+ }
Hand 2: 28.170% 26.02% 02.15% 13323594 1100309.42 { 99+, ATs+, AJo+ }
Hand 3: 18.384% 17.30% 01.09% 8857547 555711.25 { 55+, A6s+, K7s+, QTs+, Q7s, A8o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
---
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here
- maccatak11
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maccatak11
- Location: At the tables
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
Same tourney. Bacon was bubblebubble, i ended up bubble. (dont have the HH handy, so ill post from memory)
4 players left and we are on the cash bubble.
Me (button) 16k.
Villain (BB) 40k.
Both other stacks approx 20k.
Blinds 500/1000.
Dealt to me [qd][jd]
Folded to Me, I raises to 4k.
BB calls. (pot 8500)
Flop [9c][ts][x]
BB bets 3500.
Me???
4 players left and we are on the cash bubble.
Me (button) 16k.
Villain (BB) 40k.
Both other stacks approx 20k.
Blinds 500/1000.
Dealt to me [qd][jd]
Folded to Me, I raises to 4k.
BB calls. (pot 8500)
Flop [9c][ts][x]
BB bets 3500.
Me???
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
Jam it in there!
What are you waiting for?
What are you waiting for?
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
-
Des
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:17 pm
- State: SA
- Location: Somewhere
- Contact:
Re: Go for the chips, or limp into cash?
Garth Kay wrote:What are you waiting for?
The Large Hadron Collider to work.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

