villain was fairly aggro but hadn't really shown up with rubbish too often. this was 4 handed in the 3.30 late game tonight
***** Cassava Hand History for Game 226847916 *****
$800/$1,600 Blinds No Limit Holdem - *** 15 09 2009 01:11:52
Tournament #24624303 $3 + $0.30 - Table #2 (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: villain ( $32,278 )
Seat 3: p1 ( $11,244 )
Seat 5: p2( $26,556 )
Seat 7: hero ( $22,922 )
hero posts small blind [$800]
villain posts big blind [$1,600]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to hero [ 9s] [6d ]
2 folds
hero calls [$800]
villain checks
** Dealing flop ** [ 2s] [4h] [6s ]
hero checks
villain checks
** Dealing turn ** [ 9d ]
hero bets [$3,200]
villain raises [$6,400]
hero calls [$3,200]
** Dealing river ** [ 8s ]
hero checks
villain bets [$16,000]
hero??? has 14922 left
2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
Cawl.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
Yeah call.
I think you are better served to value bet and block the river, fold to a check raise.
Checking inspires a bet from Villain here, easy to turn a hand with very little showdown value into a river bluff.
I think you just have to call here.
I think you are better served to value bet and block the river, fold to a check raise.
Checking inspires a bet from Villain here, easy to turn a hand with very little showdown value into a river bluff.
I think you just have to call here.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
no noone thinks its a fold here?
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- Scotty
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7971
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: IpumpFishies
- Location: The 37th state
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
Garth Kay wrote:I think you are better served to value bet and block the river, fold to a check raise.
+1
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
bennymacca wrote:no noone thinks its a fold here?
As played it's a call. I can't find a fold here, it's a perfect trap only if that river doesn't fall a scare card.
You have to call off here. The min raise on turn reeks of a flopped set or top two from a novice player but this guy I can't see raising the turn on flush draw.
It's a crying call but you have declared him as Agro so he could be overplaying Q9 or K9 as well as firing that river with air considering you played it so weak and passive.
If you are flatting the turn you need to fire a value bet on the river, I personally think check raising on the turn is another good option, make him pay to see the river, but that is read dependant as well.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
+1
I definitely lead the river here.
I definitely lead the river here.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- maccatak11
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maccatak11
- Location: At the tables
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
Im guessing you folded?
Ill call here. I think he has a 9, and he will probably read you as having paired the flop.
Ill call here. I think he has a 9, and he will probably read you as having paired the flop.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
in this hand, i was the villain and i had KQo.
horrible bluffs FTL.
i thought he was fairly weak though, i put him on a single pair of 9s.
i checked the bb instead of raising because i had stolen his sb limps 3 times in the last 5 orbits or so, and i didn't want him to shove.
as played he tanked until his last 2 seconds and made the call. but all in all, i didn't think it was a horrible move.
the check then turn min raise usually works well and gets folds a lot of the time, so when he flatted, i figured he had a pair but was weaker than 2 pair. then the scare card came on the river, so i thought it was a good opportunity to fire again, but it was not to be.
horrible bluffs FTL.
i thought he was fairly weak though, i put him on a single pair of 9s.
i checked the bb instead of raising because i had stolen his sb limps 3 times in the last 5 orbits or so, and i didn't want him to shove.
as played he tanked until his last 2 seconds and made the call. but all in all, i didn't think it was a horrible move.
the check then turn min raise usually works well and gets folds a lot of the time, so when he flatted, i figured he had a pair but was weaker than 2 pair. then the scare card came on the river, so i thought it was a good opportunity to fire again, but it was not to be.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: 2 pair, put all in on river on a wet board
sometimes the lagtard in me jumps out and plays a hand like this 
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

