GUNS N'ROSES "NEW" ALBUM

[Todd Rivers]

14 years and $17 million in the making, or is it 17 years and $14 million?

Either way, if i had that much time and money to make one album i would've done better at sounding like Guns N' Roses and i have all the musical talents of Milli Vanilli.

There are 9 songs of the "new" 15 that i had already heard about 5 years ago. (the leaked ones)

I STILL SAY BUY IT!!!

But then Axl could read the Bible and put it on a CD and i'd buy it.

I'm listening to it now for about the 7th time and it keeps growing on me.

It IS a good album, it's just NOT GUNS N' ROSES.

I saw their concert last year and was BLOWN AWAY at how good they were, but they were just talented musicians playing classic gunners songs with the original voice.

These are the same guys as on the new album, but the material is different.

If this band was called "The Axl Rose Experiment", then it would sum it up perfectly. Good music, great songs, great voice, just not gunners.

Velvet Revolver and Buckcherry sound more like Guns N'Roses than this album does.


BUT IT ROCKS ANYWAY!!!!

G'n'F'n'R 4 eva

[David]

Someone made a mistake when they gave it to me. There were some songs that sounded a bit like Gunners. There were some songs that didn't, but sounded like Axl. Then there was some Savage Garden.



They didn't make a mistake.