Disclaimer: all of the decisions below are made on maths and maths alone. this is completely ok in a hypothetical situation as this is. but in general, there are other things to consider, such as the stage in a tournament, how big a stack we have compared with everyone else, and our general edge over the field, if any. these things are not part of this discussion, and i dont think they should be - we can debate about that in another thread
for example, the fact that we are so deep might lean us towards the conservative side, because it means that we are likely to be one of the bigger chip stacks. if we win our tournament equity doesn't increase by a huge amount, but it drops by a huge amount if we lose.
i have not considered this in the current situation, but that is something that we could debate - whether it is correct to call with ANY cards.
i am going to answer the second question first, as it forms the basis for answering whether we call or not.
Question 2UTGif UTG is solid, shoving 16bb from UTG should be pretty tight. 16bb is in the push/fold range, but it is not desperation stakes just yet - if he let the blinds pass, then he would still have 13.5bb, and basically in the same position with regards to the amount of fold equity he has. so in this case, i expect his range to be pretty tight.
i think a range like 88+, AJo+, ATs+, KQs is a pretty decent range.
MPMP's shove is clearly for isolation against the UTG shove. since he is a level 2 thinker, this means that he could have a fairly wide range, especially with hands like pocket pairs. BUT, he would flat call with his really strong hands, because he wouldn't want to isolate with these. so i would have basically the same range, but add pocket pairs 77-55, suited aces down to A8s, add KQo and KJs, and drop AA and KK, becasue these hands would flat.
this gives an overall range of 55-QQ, AJo+, A8s+, KJs+
DBnow this is where it gets interesting. this player is a rock at the best of times, and now he is shoving over 2 allins!
this is a super tight range most of the time. i doubt this is ever AK. since the other two players are relatively shorter than us, i think QQ is there still.
i give an overall range of QQ+ and thats it
Question 1now we can use pokerstove to work out our equity against these ranges with AA and KK
anyway, the pot equals 232k, and we need to put 160k at risk here.
our pot odds are (232)/160 = 1.45:1
this equates to a pot equity of 1/(1+1.45) = 1/2.45 = 40.8%
now we can use pokerstove to plug in aces or kings for us and see what we get out.
Scenario 1 - AA 11,569,195 games 20.304 secs 569,798 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
UTG: 12.302% 11.61% 00.69% 1343729 79740.67 { 88+, ATs+, KQs, AJo+ }
MP: 12.300% 12.04% 00.26% 1392974 30252.17 { QQ-55, A8s+, KJs+, AJo+, KQo }
DB: 16.391% 14.81% 01.58% 1713415 183228.00 { QQ+ }
Hero:
59.006% 56.88% 02.13% 6581078 246600.17 { AA }
as you can see from the above pokerstove output, we are 59% equity in this situation.
only 59%! that might be surprising to some people. (compare this with QQ vs AK, which is 57/43 in favour of the QQ)
in any case, our pot equity required is 40.8%. because 59% is significantly higher than 40.8%, it is a clear call.
Scenario 2 - KKno we can use pokerstove to determine our equity when we have kings
14,239,244 games 21.915 secs 649,748 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
UTG: 17.532% 16.67% 00.86% 2374107 122575.83 { 88+, ATs+, KQs, AJo+ }
MP: 14.677% 14.20% 00.48% 2021590 68550.58 { QQ-55, A8s+, KJs+, AJo+, KQo }
DB: 33.559% 30.98% 02.59% 4410640 368498.42 { QQ+ }
Hero:
34.233% 31.70% 02.53% 4514365 360853.92 { KK }
now, you can see that our equity has dropped significantly, down to 34%. as this is less than the required equity of 40.8%, this is a
clear fold.
thats right folks, the only hand that we can be justified in calling here is with aces.
as an experiment, i added AKs to the DB's range. this only increases our equity by 2%.
so in either case its a
fold.
Question 3can you elaborate on this garth?
who is DN? is that supposed to be DB?
the effective stacks are 160k with this person regardless of if we swap.
warning: spoiler will make you nerdier just for reading, and is an extension to the above question

great question garth