Garth Kay wrote:What are you doing with less than $2000 at this stage of the game anyway, unless you have been crippled in an all in move then fair enough.
It happens, buddy. Just last night I found myself with $1000 at the end of the final break (18 runners left). Coming back, I was big blind all in in two hands. I went all in J9, first hand, had a caller with AK and I hit the straight. Doubled up. Next hand, big blind, all in on AJ. Doubled up again. I finished 8th at the end of the night.
Garth Kay wrote:But these people who blind themselves out because they continue to wait for a lock hand or who limp into pots and then fold to a raise or fold their Big Blind for an additional 1000 or whatever.
Gamble people, push your chips in, go for the double up and then go for the win, don't try and limp for the points.
I have to repeat this is my own personal opinion, I am always sitting down in a tournament gunning for the win. I like to accumulate chips early and then gamble a lot when the blinds are up. No point folding or calling off your stack on your way to the points.
That's your opinion, and that's cool and all, but Staff don't play for points - we do. Maybe for you hardcore players its different, but for some of us, making the points (and therefore top 5) is a big deal. You're always going to get players limping for points. I have to say I agree with the "all or nothing" theory though (unless I'm gunning for top 5 near the end of a season
David wrote:BUT IN SAYING THAT - it does seem wrong that you can come in with MORE chips than someone still in.
Good point. But like Garth said, how many players are you going to find with $2000 or less at that stage of the game anyway? I'd say under 5 or less. And the chances that their name will be called out? Very low.
Pete: Excellent! I've got to say from a player point of view, giving someone an extra (at the most, $1500 chips) is better than having someone (who could be a better player) come back in with $2000.

