QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:32 pm

raise to 500 pre, jam over the 3bet if/when it comes

ezy game?
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby rcon » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:41 pm

Hero does start with 70BB and has committed only ~10% of stack, it is before 1st break and the other two stacks were both healthy (58BB & 30BB)

I just don't feel this is a spot we need to call off with equity running 50/50. We've still got a very playable stack if we fold.

If this was against one villain I can see the value in stacking off, particularly if the villain was the 30BB dude.

This situation I've been burnt too many times early in MTTs
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:43 pm

Yes that was meant to be my other point, raise more pre with limpers behind.
4 bet with QQ in that spot to around 2400 - 2800, fold to a jam.

At higher stakes be wary of anyone flatting your four bet.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:44 pm

rcon wrote:Hero does start with 70BB and has committed only ~10% of stack, it is before 1st break and the other two stacks were both healthy (58BB & 30BB)

I just don't feel this is a spot we need to call off with equity running 50/50. We've still got a very playable stack if we fold.

If this was against one villain I can see the value in stacking off, particularly if the villain was the 30BB dude.

This situation I've been burnt too many times early in MTTs


Oh, I am definitely advocating the fold, but you just can't right off pokerstove or your equity in the hand simply because you have seen this spot before.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:45 pm

Trishan called, hit running Q's to beat AA and 77 and then was berated for calling in that spot?
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby rcon » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:50 pm

Garth Kay wrote:Oh, I am definitely advocating the fold, but you just can't right off pokerstove or your equity in the hand simply because you have seen this spot before.
Oh good. I do get what you're saying.

I have to say tho, I would have thought tournament equity would have required us to be a little closer to the money for a meaningful result? being lazy here - feel free to say "go run the numbers yourself you lazy so and so" :D
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:00 pm

rcon wrote:
Garth Kay wrote:Oh, I am definitely advocating the fold, but you just can't right off pokerstove or your equity in the hand simply because you have seen this spot before.
Oh good. I do get what you're saying.

I have to say tho, I would have thought tournament equity would have required us to be a little closer to the money for a meaningful result? being lazy here - feel free to say "go run the numbers yourself you lazy so and so" :D


No that's why I said we need to know what stage of the tournament we are at, we definitely need to be pretty close to the money.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
gmatical
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: gmatical
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby gmatical » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:35 am

Are we that worried by the panic shove from the first guy on the flop ?

Seems a strange play by a hand that beats QQ - although they could & fear the flush/straightening board I s'pose.

The call is a bit more concerning - but given stack size, if they have any pocket pair or hit the board (even with a drawing hand) most of these guys get it in.

Ummmmm..............

I think I call expecting to be ahead of the 1st guy - hopefully scoop if the short(ish) stack misses the draw.

Side pot will basically leave you with a similar stack as you started the hand.

These are the toughest spots - the deciscion should be influenced by what plays you have SEEN these players make (and showdown).

Having said all that - nothing wrong with folding here.

Arrrrrgggghhhhh....... i think i have changed my mind, maybe folding because we have no real idea what we are facing.






This hand should have came with a warning














Image
May all your pain be champagne!

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby bennymacca » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:42 am

they have super fishy stats.

the min 3bet pre, now the shove on the flop is a classic "i have the two red aces and there is a flush draw out there" play from a fish i think.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
trishan
Posts: 4515
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: nplking
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby trishan » Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:17 am

It was fairly early in the tourney but that said if I won the hand I would be in first and pretty much guarantee a cash. In hindsight I definitely should have folded because as rcon said, I still have a playable stack when I fold here.

I called, mainly because they seemed so fishy. In a higher buy-in tournament at later stage I think I would have folded pretty quickly. Any way one guy had [Kc][Kh], the other rolls [As][9c] and hits the [ah] on the river to scoop the main pot. I am left with 11BBs.
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests