i think this is wrong but ill get ur advise about rasing

[Miick]

ya i know im right with this just need to get
the TC to get it right lol i sent off email so hopfully
they call em

[gmatical]

i woulda called the 17k but not the 25k with 69

I think perhaps the TC's aren't your only problem at the FT!

[Miick]

lol i was chip leader and it was like 4 callers. i woulda hit trips. winner of hand now has 130k me 75k

[gmatical]

I'm just teasin'!

[JMACK007]

Given the original reasoning it would then be 60k not 40k if it was true that you needed to double the blinds given that blinds are 15k 30k. I have had this exact argument at venues before that you have the choice of just calling and not having to bet at least double the blinds in this situation ( not at my local 888 venues but else where.) This is why it is so important that the TD knows the rules because as you said some rulings can have a big impact on the tournament.
I had one game that I played (different league) where I pushed all in as small blind for 25k with blinds 10/20k. Big blind proceeded to push all in and when I advised him he only needed to put in 5k he became very abusive and insisted he wanted to be all in. I tried to explain why this was not necessary and then the moron who was TD advised that I could not stop another player going all in and I should let them play there cards how they wanted . I was just so over it and knew he had me smashed I said fine go all in. He did we turned over, he had aces, and then I said now take back your other 100k as I cant win that. Should have let it stay there as I won the hand with my jack ten with two pair and I think he was too stupid to realize that I could not win it all.

I am pretty sure BB is intitled to go all in here as he has not yet had a chance to act? If there are others already in the hand before you went all in, then he has a right to go allin here....

[Miick]

yeah big blind can because they have not acted but if people after them who already called can not because there was no raise