Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby bennymacca » Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:38 pm

the rebuy frenzy was super dooper fun. like the best fun i have had playing a tourney in ages.

the only thing i would change is maybe being able to extend the play slightly on the final table. maybe going to 15 min levels on the FT would be a good idea.

other than that, it was really fun, especially when working out how many chips to buy at the addon period. My table was really fun with wabbit and bigblktriton on there, and we all had deep pockets, i think most people bought $50-80 worth, which meant there were LOTS of chips on the table, and that was fun.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby Garth Kay » Mon Aug 08, 2011 1:58 pm

So it was fun?
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby bennymacca » Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:10 pm

Garth Kay wrote:So it was fun?



yeah absolutely loved it. and it has nothing to do with the fact that i finished second :D

given that it created approximately a 1800 prize pool (i think) for 40 odd players as well, nearly $50 each, i think that it was a great way to boost the prize pool too, and was a fun departure from a $50 freezeout in my opinion.

could be an option for satellites too imo.


the only things that i didn't like much were the fact that it was pretty turbo on the final table, but it wasn't too bad, certainly nothing that would every stop me playing the game.

another thing that annoyed me and a lot of other people was people tanking too much.

there was a guy who tanked for a minute against me, after putting half his stack in, DURING THE REBUY PERIOD.

so maybe stressing to people that this is a turbo and decisions should also be turbo would be great.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby maccatak11 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:25 pm

Garth Kay wrote:So it was fun?


bennymacca wrote:the rebuy frenzy was super dooper fun. like the best fun i have had playing a tourney in ages.

the only thing i would change is maybe being able to extend the play slightly on the final table. maybe going to 15 min levels on the FT would be a good idea.

other than that, it was really fun, especially when working out how many chips to buy at the addon period. My table was really fun with wabbit and bigblktriton on there, and we all had deep pockets, i think most people bought $50-80 worth, which meant there were LOTS of chips on the table, and that was fun.


This is what Garth was getting at benny the cunt.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby bennymacca » Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:30 pm

i know. it was fun, fun fun :D
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
BigBlkTriton
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:33 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: BigBlkTriton
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby BigBlkTriton » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:02 pm

well done benny the cunt always FUN playing games like that, especially when you and Mike are around. For me it was interesting to watch the strategies people use during the rebuy period.

I enjoyed the Saturdays games aswell as Sundays but im just a poker rat. My only thoughts would be that i would love to see the Saturday better supported by players, numbers always equals more fun. This being said I could understand considering i outlayed $405 for the weekend, luckily winning a $50 sng and chopping the PLO $5 single rebuy, after 8 flips and still no winner we needed to start the sng. So i came through ok. Good weekend just a teaser for the GF
A TRITON AMONG THE MINNOWS

User avatar
Caleb
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: manwithaduck
Contact:

Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby Caleb » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:13 pm

LOL at benny the cunt complaining about the FT being too turbo.

It was advertised the whole time as a super turbo rebuy FRENZY.

You don't just switch the structure around when everyone decides to buy 100BB each at addons and play deep.

The game went 80 mins past the scheduled finish. I fail to see the issue with keeping the blinds the same length the whole way through.

It's like you want a rebuy frenzy into a deepstack but for the game to finish within 4 hrs so everyone can play the next event. Not realistic mate.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator

"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Feedback about the State Finals Side Events

Postby bennymacca » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:31 pm

the only reason it went longer was becasue andre kept doubling up the person at risk!

i just think the final table should have been capped so that there was about 15BB on the entire table, not for each person, but for the table. i know its not realistic to have a deepstacked final table, but i think everyone having 4bb, when we havent even made the cash yet, doesn't make for good poker either.

in the end, the decision was made by andre and tim to cap the blinds at 40/80k/5k, which meant there was about 20bb on the entire table, which i think was a good idea.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter


Return to “South Australia”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests