Obscure question
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
What's this fair play rule?
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
exactly. There are rules, and there is etiquette, but there is no such thing as fair play.AceLosesKing wrote:What's this fair play rule?
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
- maccatak11
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maccatak11
- Location: At the tables
- Contact:
- Brett Kay
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:09 pm
- State: WA
- 888PL Name: Kodakai
- Location: Middle of WA.
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
AceLosesKing wrote:What's this fair play rule?
Could be spirit or interests of the game.
Load "*" ,8,1
Run
Run
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
AceLosesKing wrote:What's this fair play rule?
I think Harps is referring to the grey area that allows the TD to make a decision in the best interest's of the game.....
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
- rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Obscure question
A TD can make a ruling, but I always thought that was based on intent (either of the player hiding cards, or moving chips/cards). Pretty sure "fair" wasn't one of the things they took into account. Happy to be corrected.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
So if you were the TD, would you award the entire bet to the guy hiding his cards, or just the min blind amount??
I have seen this scenario a number of times, and usually the player mucking only has to hand over the blind amount (depending on what the other player has actually done before the cards were mucked....)
I have seen this scenario a number of times, and usually the player mucking only has to hand over the blind amount (depending on what the other player has actually done before the cards were mucked....)
Last edited by JMACK007 on Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
- Caleb
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: manwithaduck
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
JMACK007 wrote:So if you were the TD, would you award the ientire bet to the guy hiding his cards, or just the min blind amount??
I have seen this scenario a number of times, and usually the player mucking only has to hand over the blind amount (depending on what the other player has actually done before the cards were mucked....)
Just to clarify, you mean the call amount right, not the blind amount? What you're saying could be misconstrued in a post-flop situation or a situation with a raise already.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
Caleb Rybalka wrote:JMACK007 wrote:So if you were the TD, would you award the entire bet to the guy hiding his cards, or just the min blind amount??
I have seen this scenario a number of times, and usually the player mucking only has to hand over the blind amount (depending on what the other player has actually done before the cards were mucked....)
Just to clarify, you mean the call amount right, not the blind amount? What you're saying could be misconstrued in a post-flop situation or a situation with a raise already.
Yes mate, the minimum amount that the mucking player is in for, i.e., if no one has raised before them, then it is the blind amount. Please let me know if this is wrong??
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
- Caleb
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: manwithaduck
- Contact:
Re: Obscure question
Correct.
But in a post flop situation with no previous bet they would take their whole bet back and lose the rest of the pot. Saying they lose the blind amount would infer that they were receive a chip penalty or something like that.
But in a post flop situation with no previous bet they would take their whole bet back and lose the rest of the pot. Saying they lose the blind amount would infer that they were receive a chip penalty or something like that.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
