How about....

[BigPete33]

I realise the points distribution is a set thing, and can agree with the reasons why, but what are the thoughts on making it the top 20 get points for when there's 100+ runners?

Could be fairly easily implemented I would think and just continue on from the existing points 'payout' structure.

Thoughts please....

[Garth Kay]

Has Big Pete finished on the bubble one too many times? In all honesty it wouldn't be that easy to implement. The coding required whilst slightly above intermediate level, would probably take quite awhile to get into place.

[BigPete33]

haha yes!

and won't argue about the coding - but that's what code monkeys are for

Other than that is it a good/bad/otherwise idea?

[Rickster]

I don't think it is a good idea, mainly because I think there is certainty when we know it is top 15 who gets points. The size of the tournament will be reflected from the size of the bonus points.

[BigPete33]

That's why I kept the suggestion simple ie if there's 100+ runners then it's top 20 and that's it. Don't have to be a maths genius to pay attention to your TD announcing that there's 100+ runners

[Darren B]

Everyone else may be fine.....for you....well....we may have to repeat it a few times.......eg...blinds are up......blinds are up.....PETE BLINDS ARE UP

[Ondie J]

ANYTHING to try and consistently make the points eh Pete? If you get this one in a cpl of seasons though, I'll hand over a six pack of carlsberg. Now that's some incentive to try and get it up and running

[BigPete33]

hehe

sorry...missed that

[Possie]

sounds ok as long as it is clear to all players at the beggining of the season.

No changing part way through the season.