Laura wrote:steve_g wrote:i think the freeroll was the best indication of poker skill
1. laura
2. steve_g
3 todd182
scary top 3 there hahahahaha
I'm fabulous.
if you dont say so your self
Laura wrote:steve_g wrote:i think the freeroll was the best indication of poker skill
1. laura
2. steve_g
3 todd182
scary top 3 there hahahahaha
I'm fabulous.
Garth Kay wrote:Krunchie turns me on.
David wrote:How can people say that "the good players will still go well and the other players will do as well as they usually do" so the points won't matter?
Are you saying that DPD creates an illusion? That people can get higher than they already are, easier?
I see the reason for it. And I see the logic behind it. I just think it slightly tarnishes the idea of the points system. Yes, it's Free Poker, yes it's fun, yes whatever. I know that. But the fact of the matter is that even if you are good, you might actually miss out because you happen to not do well at the right time of the year. That's a simple fact - poker is about doing well over time. The good players don't always win, and the bad players don't always lose. The good players, though, over time will do better than the not-so-good players.
I don't quite know what my point is.
.Todd Rivers wrote:David wrote:How can people say that "the good players will still go well and the other players will do as well as they usually do" so the points won't matter?
Are you saying that DPD creates an illusion? That people can get higher than they already are, easier?
I see the reason for it. And I see the logic behind it. I just think it slightly tarnishes the idea of the points system. Yes, it's Free Poker, yes it's fun, yes whatever. I know that. But the fact of the matter is that even if you are good, you might actually miss out because you happen to not do well at the right time of the year. That's a simple fact - poker is about doing well over time. The good players don't always win, and the bad players don't always lose. The good players, though, over time will do better than the not-so-good players.
THIS SOUNDS A LITTLE 'bruceklmish'..?..
I don't quite know what my point is.
I was always pretty good at most things but never the best.
Poker rewards the top 10% of players generally so thats what i always aim for.
50 runners - aim for 5th
385 runners - 38th is a good finish.
As David said - "consistency over time"

..

BigPete33 wrote:I just checked your results Vic...
You have 3 placings over 50 points.
Get off the grass mate, you NEED the double points.
Chelsea4thewin wrote:Adam Hughes is really terrible at finishing, blows every chance he gets
rcon wrote:Even a "at some point during this season, we will be offering double points for a period of 2 weeks - you will have 1 weeks notice" might have made it a little easier to take for runners.BigPete33 wrote:Having said that, one thing I will agree with is the poor timing and amount of notice for this promotion. At least announce these things at the start of the season.
I got the impression from Carlos's reply that the whole idea of it was to spring it on punters - it doesn't seem to have gone down too well, but you'll only really hear from those it disadvantages, not those it advantages, bennymacca being the exception.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests