krunchie wrote:i cant see how the above percived problem can be possible
Council members should have no power as individuals. Only as a a member of the governing body, so in this instance you would report the problem player to the councill then as a group they would gather all the information ( including the council members testimony as they were present) and make a ruling.
To think we could have players running around ruling the NPL and overinding the Tds is a joke and would not happen, Garth and Co would not let it as it would make a mockery of the point of the councill.
Also i dont think the elected members of the councill would be that sort of person, It had already been said that the ideal candidates would be well rounded individuals, this sort of hypothosis suggests idiots in the council.
Very true Crunchie, as it shouldn't, couldn't and wouldn't, be the responsability of any singular council member to even think of getting involved in that sort of situation. Any issues that arises at a venue should be handled by NPL's TD or TA as they are the controlling body.
The way I see a Players Reps duties are only to be seen as a group of players approved by NPL management to assist NPL management and selected TD's in discussing new ideas and or problems arising from NPL's current or future format
"from a players pERspective".
Obviously, if you were a council member then you would be obliged to table any feedback you may hear or receive from other players. Assuming the seriousness is minimal you would forward the information onto the TD or Tim Harry or leave it to be heard at one of the combined meetings throughout the year.