Question of the Day 21/08

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.

What should you do?

Fold
2
10%
Raise all in
11
55%
call
7
35%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: Question of the Day 21/08

Postby maccatak11 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:58 pm

So all big bets are bluffs and all small bets are value bets?

Ever heard of a post oak bluff??
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
AJG
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:07 am
State: SA
888PL Name: .pKoIkNeGr.
Contact:

Re: Question of the Day 21/08

Postby AJG » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:18 pm

Yep, but how often have you encountered one?
Me: not very often...
Edit: and they hardly ever worked, I called most of them with mid pair or worse that won
Image ...11.59% of bad beat stories are just misplayed hands ...

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Question of the Day 21/08

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:25 pm

Ok So if we actually remove the fact that hero has A7 suited what sort of hands are you putting a player on if this action occurs (let's turn the hero into the villain):

PF: Raise in position
F: Bet out 3/4 pot after action is checked to you.
T: Check in position on rag board after receiving c/c on flop
R: All opponents check to you bet 1/2 pot.

I am sorry but the line on this action reads to me as either:

A.) Weak hand strength and river bet is placed to entice fold (as opponents have played their hands as passive) - range ATo+, >55 and KTs+

or

B.) Landed top set on the flop (or top two) and villains hand has a lot of strength and we have history on opponents in the hand - metagame play.

or

C.) A weak two pair or top pair with marginal kicker is in play and the villain believes his hand now has some value in betting the river against his opponent.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Question of the Day 21/08

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:33 pm

I see more decent players value bet the river now; when they are concerned about the showdown strength of their hand. I see a lot of decent aggressive players overbet more on the river with the second to third nuts than anything else.

Also weak players are just notorious for small bet sizing (in regards to the pot) post flop when they believe they have a weak hand.

In lower stakes games I see so many of my opponents c bet a flop and if their hand is strong they bet 2/3rd to full pot, if their hand is weak they bet less than half pot, and they generally do the same thing on later streets. If I am heads up in the pot and I see a weak c bet on the flop I will generally decide to re raise here (or on the turn depending on my hand strength) simply because 90% of the time their bet sizing reveals their hand strength and their intentions - it's simply the thought process: "Oh well, my hand was strong pre flop, but with that flop I've got Ace high, sigh, I'll just bet small so I'm not risking much chips and I might get these chumps to fold. If I just get called I can see a turn cheap and if anyone re raises me I can get away from the hand cheaply."
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests