Port Magpies

Talk about sport!
Des
Posts: 5003
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:17 pm
State: SA
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Des » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:06 pm

Take over? Clubs aren't privately owned in the SANFL afaik.
Image

User avatar
Brett Kay
Posts: 3762
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:09 pm
State: WA
888PL Name: Kodakai
Location: Middle of WA.
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Brett Kay » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:12 pm

Well seems like 2010 is ok for them for now.

White knight has rode in, now they have to sort their carp out and fix it.
Load "*" ,8,1
Run

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby maccatak11 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:48 pm

yeah gordon pickard will throw a million or two at them i think
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

Des
Posts: 5003
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:17 pm
State: SA
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Des » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:58 pm

he's a good bloke

not sure how much he's offered, but its for this season only

hopefully by then the power, and crows to a lesser extent, can work out a better AAMI stadium deal and hand the port club back to the magpies
Image

User avatar
Origami
Posts: 1463
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:12 am
State: SA
888PL Name: .AAABK.
Location: NURIOOTPA in the BAROSSA VALLEY
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Origami » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:06 am

my 2 cents worth.
Bucky Cunningham with Alan Scotts monies get Pt Power into the AFL they get a Flag.. Cunningham leaves Alan Scotts monies dries up Power struggle and the Maggies flounder as their resouces are spread too thin... Picard throws them monies ...me thinks the Maggies r History..

The future is AFL to PAP credit they are there but...not a Power....

:lol:

which AFL team has never lost a Grand Final ???
..ImageImage..Image

User avatar
Sinitster
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:50 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Sinitster
Location: reality ... to who ?
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Sinitster » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:29 am

bruceklm wrote: :lol:

which AFL team has never lost a Grand Final ???



Image
When choosing between the 2 evils , I like to choose the 1 i haven't tried yet !
Image

Chips are like burley , ya need to spread a little around to attract the fishies ...

User avatar
Bacon
Posts: 6059
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Bacon8100
Location: Beyond the fence
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Bacon » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:25 am

I can't see the pic at work, but is it Fremantle?
I'm not perfect. I'm what perfect aspires to become

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby Scotty » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:48 am

Yes.

User avatar
gundog
Posts: 1036
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:29 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Murray Cod
Location: 100yards from the 42nd Gum Tree on the left
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby gundog » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:12 am

Irrespective of the parentage of both Port Adelaide Clubs they both have a unique position you either love'm or hate'm theres no middle ground.

As for the decision of the SANFL and the commission, they both got it wrong the merger should have been allowed and the only reason it wasnt allowed, is the Crow's stated openly that if it went ahead they would want a team in the SANFL, and that had the other 8 clubs running scared.

The Crows have been marketed very well and with a team in the 2nd tier comp, their ability to attract even more preimum sponsers, and possibily dominate the SANFL for many years and that scares the hell out of the other 8 clubs, and thats real hidden adjenda of the 8 other clubs.

If anyone thinks that the SANFL wont be affected by the expansion of the AFL is seriously putting there heads in the sand, GC and WS will see 80 to 100 more players needed for the AFL where will they come from SANFL, VFL, TFL and WAFL ( which is already a basket case) also minor state leagues from the other states.

Ask your self this if a reasonable player at country level gets invited to play for a SANFL team starts in the 2's and get $40 dollars a week, the next season that bloke get an offer from a county club in Vic offering $750 a week and a job for him and his partner, what would you do? so that begs the question where are the clubs going to get their players to sustain a quality compertition?
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Port Magpies

Postby bennymacca » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:26 am

gundog wrote:As for the decision of the SANFL and the commission, they both got it wrong the merger should have been allowed and the only reason it wasnt allowed, is the Crow's stated openly that if it went ahead they would want a team in the SANFL, and that had the other 8 clubs running scared.


completely false gundog, the merger was never about the football departments, only the administration and marketing side. have you actually read the paper?

gundog wrote:The Crows have been marketed very well and with a team in the 2nd tier comp, their ability to attract even more preimum sponsers, and possibily dominate the SANFL for many years and that scares the hell out of the other 8 clubs, and thats real hidden adjenda of the 8 other clubs.


it has nothing to do with it gundog. the sanfl clubs all pay fees etc to the sanfl, which then get re-distributed. so in effect, they would be propping up the magpies.

now if they dont think that the magpies and the power will be financially successful, why would they support it? they would be throwing their money away.

if there was a hidden agenda, why did the sanfl comission also vote the merger down? surely they are independent of the interests of the clubs.

gundog wrote:If anyone thinks that the SANFL wont be affected by the expansion of the AFL is seriously putting there heads in the sand, GC and WS will see 80 to 100 more players needed for the AFL where will they come from SANFL, VFL, TFL and WAFL ( which is already a basket case) also minor state leagues from the other states.


this is a good point. it will lessen the strength of the sanfl.

gundog wrote:Ask your self this if a reasonable player at country level gets invited to play for a SANFL team starts in the 2's and get $40 dollars a week, the next season that bloke get an offer from a county club in Vic offering $750 a week and a job for him and his partner, what would you do? so that begs the question where are the clubs going to get their players to sustain a quality compertition?


this happens already, so i don't think it will change that much with the addition of the new afl teams. in fact, it might make the sanfl clubs work harder to keep their reserves and junior players.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter


Return to “Sport”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests