*unmarks topic*
This is really pedantic, and I will not be involved in another 2 pages of discussion on who is right/wrong.
can you please look at this for me
-
AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
-
rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
standard terminology is "i raise to YxBB", not "I raise BB+YxBB" lol
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
-
Des
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:17 pm
- State: SA
- Location: Somewhere
- Contact:
-
rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
spoilsportAceLosesKing wrote:*unmarks topic*
This is really pedantic, and I will not be involved in another 2 pages of discussion on who is right/wrong.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
-
muzzington
- Moderator
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:31 pm
- State: SA
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
AceLosesKing wrote:*unmarks topic*
This is really pedantic, and I will not be involved in another 2 pages of discussion on who is right/wrong.
I disagree.
We've how about links I would like to know I walk the line scrunches line at how the client Lawrence etc. etc.
-
Des
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:17 pm
- State: SA
- Location: Somewhere
- Contact:
-
David
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8964
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Locker101
- Location: The Scumm Bar
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
In live pub poker, usually the word missing, is "to".
Small blind is 50, big blind is 100.
First person says "Raise 300"
Really, this means it's 400, as they are raising 300.
What they mean is "Raise to 300"
When someone raises from 100 to 250, they are raising to 2.5x the big blind.
Small blind is 50, big blind is 100.
First person says "Raise 300"
Really, this means it's 400, as they are raising 300.
What they mean is "Raise to 300"
When someone raises from 100 to 250, they are raising to 2.5x the big blind.
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.
-
gundog
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:29 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Murray Cod
- Location: 100yards from the 42nd Gum Tree on the left
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
however the other night on WSOP Europe Daniel N in a hand from the small blind flat called to the BB the BB then raised it to x.
Daniel N then said I'm calling and something like " slamming you up" and proceeded to drop chips on the table with both hands, the BB spun out and requested a ruling from one of the floor, the ruling went in Daniels favor.
So based on that ruling, you can call and then raise as long as it annonced before placing your chips in.
So in effect every raise is actually a call and raise so then the maths becomes academic...so the bet can be X times the BB or the raise is X times the previous bet.
Crikey this is getting pedantic.
Daniel N then said I'm calling and something like " slamming you up" and proceeded to drop chips on the table with both hands, the BB spun out and requested a ruling from one of the floor, the ruling went in Daniels favor.
So based on that ruling, you can call and then raise as long as it annonced before placing your chips in.
So in effect every raise is actually a call and raise so then the maths becomes academic...so the bet can be X times the BB or the raise is X times the previous bet.
Crikey this is getting pedantic.
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
-
David
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8964
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Locker101
- Location: The Scumm Bar
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
I don't quite know your point there.
That isn't what we're talking about.
What Daniel did was either a string bet or not a string bet. He verbalised he was raising, so that was what they went on.
Fact of the matter is, a raise to 2.5x the BB, is a total bet of 2.5x the BB.
Simple logic.
That isn't what we're talking about.
What Daniel did was either a string bet or not a string bet. He verbalised he was raising, so that was what they went on.
Fact of the matter is, a raise to 2.5x the BB, is a total bet of 2.5x the BB.
Simple logic.
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.
-
Bacon
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Bacon8100
- Location: Beyond the fence
- Contact:
Re: can you please look at this for me
maccatak11 wrote:No, thats 2.5 times the BB. raises/bets are talked about as multiples of the BB, not how much extra above the BB the actual bet/raise is. so 2x is a min-raise.
Think this way: Post-flop
Bet of 200 (2xBB - Or 2x).
Raised to 800. The bet is 8xBB, but the raise is 6xBB.
I'm not perfect. I'm what perfect aspires to become
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests