Ok, I don't normally do this, but want a few opinions on this one:
Final Table in a 60+ runner live tourney. You come to the table 2nd chip lead. It gets down to 5 players, you are under the gun with [7s7h] . You have 200,000 in chips with Blinds 20,000/40,000 with 2,000 ante. Chip leader is 2 to the right of you (but the two of you have about even stacks at this stage). You call the 40,000 BB, UTG+1 folds, chip leader shoves for 200,000 on the button (this is the first hand he has played on FT including when he was in the blinds). Action folds to you.
What do you do???
Final Table Play
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Final Table Play
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
-
Nathan Butler
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: sHipIt2me
- Location: South Australia
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
Call.
200K = 5 BBs.
I would have shoved UTG personally rather than limp call.
After making the call of 40K (leaving me with 160K) By the time that action was folded back around the pot would have been offering nice odds to call for a heads up flip. the would have been 140K in the middle (SB, BB, limp 40 plus your 40) plus an additional 160 which is the amount to call.
thats 2/1 on what I would expect was a 50/50. 10-20% you may have an over pair (but thats generous for 5 handed) More often the not it is 50/50 but hopefully (for the 77) you would have jammed A-X (with a kicker lower than seven).
In all. I snap.
200K = 5 BBs.
I would have shoved UTG personally rather than limp call.
After making the call of 40K (leaving me with 160K) By the time that action was folded back around the pot would have been offering nice odds to call for a heads up flip. the would have been 140K in the middle (SB, BB, limp 40 plus your 40) plus an additional 160 which is the amount to call.
thats 2/1 on what I would expect was a 50/50. 10-20% you may have an over pair (but thats generous for 5 handed) More often the not it is 50/50 but hopefully (for the 77) you would have jammed A-X (with a kicker lower than seven).
In all. I snap.
Nathan Butler
NEW WEBSITE IS LIVE!
http://www.clickprintsave.com.au
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Click-Print-Save/244278255608144 - "Like" me please. I like you!
NEW WEBSITE IS LIVE!
http://www.clickprintsave.com.au
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Click-Print-Save/244278255608144 - "Like" me please. I like you!
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
Do not limp here. Shove all in.
As played, snap it off.
As played, snap it off.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- krunchie
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:07 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Krunchie74
- Location: i was hoping you could tell me !
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
agreed, wack it all in there and watch your 77 hold against his ace paint.
Must agree with the boys though i dont like the limp from UTG, should have been a shove from the get go.
Must agree with the boys though i dont like the limp from UTG, should have been a shove from the get go.
Does anyone know how to make money playing uno vs 6 year olds, its about the only card game i get to play these days.
Garth Kay wrote:Krunchie turns me on.
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
As played must call.
Next time with less than 10 - 20BB's (depends on size of antes as well) it's an open shove.
It's all about the fold equity!!
We had a similar discussion at Para Hills Jo: If you are going to commit to a hand with a short stack (and marginal holdings) then really your only move is to put them all in as this move may entice a fold 25 - 45% of the time.
And with marginal holdings I would prefer to see my opponents folding and me simply increasing my stack by 10% or more.
Next time with less than 10 - 20BB's (depends on size of antes as well) it's an open shove.
It's all about the fold equity!!
We had a similar discussion at Para Hills Jo: If you are going to commit to a hand with a short stack (and marginal holdings) then really your only move is to put them all in as this move may entice a fold 25 - 45% of the time.
And with marginal holdings I would prefer to see my opponents folding and me simply increasing my stack by 10% or more.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- gundog
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:29 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Murray Cod
- Location: 100yards from the 42nd Gum Tree on the left
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
You would have to ask yourself if I fold will I get better cards in the next 2 hands considering Blinds & Antes will eat up approximatly 50% of your remaining stack.
Folding the next 2 hands also will leave you a bit over 70k this puts you in a shove/fold situation on any remaining hands, best to get it all in now.
Whats your read on the all in ?
Folding the next 2 hands also will leave you a bit over 70k this puts you in a shove/fold situation on any remaining hands, best to get it all in now.
Whats your read on the all in ?
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
- Scotty
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7971
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: IpumpFishies
- Location: The 37th state
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
Shove instead of limp pre.
I'd say button has A9 or some such hand.
I'd say button has A9 or some such hand.
- David
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8964
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Locker101
- Location: The Scumm Bar
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
Agreed.
Shove pre. You made their decision easier by limping. Or fold - if you don't want to commit all you chips that hand.
Call shove - it's not like you need the points or anything

Shove pre. You made their decision easier by limping. Or fold - if you don't want to commit all you chips that hand.
Call shove - it's not like you need the points or anything
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
Ok, thanks guys.
I pulled this from a hand I played recently, but in reverse. I was the chip leader on the button. I had A9 (nice read Scott!). UTG seemed reluctant to even call the blind (and by just calling showed me their hand was probably weak), so I shoved thinking there is no way they could call there considering I hadn't played a hand on the FT until then, and they still had plenty of chips behind if they fold their weak hand.
I like you guys would have at least pushed 120,000 into the pot in their position instead of just call, as I don't want the other chip leader in the hand.
As it turned out, they did call my shove and the 7's held, so they could argue that their limp prob paid off (as I wouldn't have played if they didn't limp), but just wanted to see what you guys would have done in their position (having played it the way they did), to see if my shove was really the right play there.
I can see your points, and that is why I asked the question as I can use that info when in that position next time.
Cheers
I pulled this from a hand I played recently, but in reverse. I was the chip leader on the button. I had A9 (nice read Scott!). UTG seemed reluctant to even call the blind (and by just calling showed me their hand was probably weak), so I shoved thinking there is no way they could call there considering I hadn't played a hand on the FT until then, and they still had plenty of chips behind if they fold their weak hand.
I like you guys would have at least pushed 120,000 into the pot in their position instead of just call, as I don't want the other chip leader in the hand.
As it turned out, they did call my shove and the 7's held, so they could argue that their limp prob paid off (as I wouldn't have played if they didn't limp), but just wanted to see what you guys would have done in their position (having played it the way they did), to see if my shove was really the right play there.
I can see your points, and that is why I asked the question as I can use that info when in that position next time.
Cheers
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Final Table Play
I thought you were better than limping a pair UTG 5 handed with 5 blinds 
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
