Come on hand discussioners!

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
madali
Posts: 955
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:59 am
State: VIC
888PL Name: queenoftarts
Location: Bendigo
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby madali » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:46 am

Really dont think he had the flush actually almost certain he does not. My read is full book only which still beats me. The guy went on to make many all in bets, mainly preflop and after seeing what he was doing this with I really wished I had called. His 90k stack was down to 30k within 5 minutes. I got moved shortly after this when I checked he was out within about another 1/2 hour.

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:50 am

madali wrote:Really dont think he had the flush actually almost certain he does not. My read is full book only which still beats me. The guy went on to make many all in bets, mainly preflop and after seeing what he was doing this with I really wished I had called. His 90k stack was down to 30k within 5 minutes. I got moved shortly after this when I checked he was out within about another 1/2 hour.


QT and 66 are the only realistic hands that you beat, i think if he has these you just pay him off and move on.

i agree, he has a flush here never.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
gmatical
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: gmatical
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby gmatical » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:51 am

bennymacca wrote:
madali wrote:Opinions please.


villain basically never has a flush here. since the Q is a Q of spades, villain can't have hands like KQ or AQ suited that would call 2 streets and then backdoor the flush.


Villan has the stack to chase with AXss (any X, could be 2s), and may well have.

I think check/calling an all in play (unless they have been caught stealing in similar spots) with a far from nut hand is not advisable.

The power of a big stack shove on display here - so confusing and such dire consequenses if wrong.
May all your pain be champagne!

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:23 am

its a runner runner flush, thats the difference

if there were 2 spades on the flop, its a fold for me.

but even crazies dont chase runner runner flushes most of the time.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
gmatical
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: gmatical
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby gmatical » Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:57 am

bennymacca wrote:its a runner runner flush, thats the difference

if there were 2 spades on the flop, its a fold for me.

but even crazies dont chase runner runner flushes most of the time.


Ohhhhhhh they chase the nut flush (or at least see the next card) for 900 most days of the week.

If they have quadrupled up early in a tourney (judging by stack sizes he has)- i would suspect they may be the type that chase flushes regardless of odds.

madali wrote:Really dont think he had the flush actually almost certain he does not. My read is full book only which still beats me. The guy went on to make many all in bets, mainly preflop and after seeing what he was doing this with I really wished I had called. His 90k stack was down to 30k within 5 minutes. I got moved shortly after this when I checked he was out within about another 1/2 hour.


In this case it should be an easy call (if you are beaten by a Full House, its just bad luck.)

I hate when I make what I think is a big fold only to see the stack spazz off his chips real quick after that.

I will say it again tho, thats the power of the big stack river shove.

I do remember my bust out hand of the PLO (to the best of my recollection)

I was blinded out the first levels because we had to drive to our friends house for some poker playing fun times.
I folded another round or so with junk and saw a free flop from the BB with

578X (suits not relevent)

Flop 557 - i start dancing woop woop full boat -my pot bet gets called

Turn 8 - woop woop - boat got bigger my all in gets called!! Happy days!!

Well, actually no - opponent rolls 77xx for a bigger boat from the get go!

I lol'ed - i imagine he lol'ed a whole lot louded tho!
May all your pain be champagne!

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:08 pm

gmatical wrote:578X (suits not relevent)

Flop 557 - i start dancing woop woop full boat -my pot bet gets called

Turn 8 - woop woop - boat got bigger my all in gets called!! Happy days!!

Well, actually no - opponent rolls 77xx for a bigger boat from the get go!


sick cooler.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
Caleb
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: manwithaduck
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby Caleb » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:39 pm

bennymacca wrote:
gmatical wrote:578X (suits not relevent)

Flop 557 - i start dancing woop woop full boat -my pot bet gets called

Turn 8 - woop woop - boat got bigger my all in gets called!! Happy days!!

Well, actually no - opponent rolls 77xx for a bigger boat from the get go!


sick cooler.



I was on that table and I remember that hand.

For around 3 laps of the table you needed the nut full just to play. We had full into full nearly 10 times.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator

"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:44 pm

stupid omaha nut peddlers. get in there and gambool!
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby Scotty » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:52 pm

Stupid holdem players, playing omaha like holdem :D

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Come on hand discussioners!

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:59 pm

Scott wrote:Stupid holdem players, playing omaha like holdem :D


yep i agree :D
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests