Paparazzi Lounge
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
well i was top 5 at a venue that closed during the season, and i still qualified.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
Conspiracy Theorist wrote:Still waiting for an answer on this, seems to be all the rage around here.
CT
If you have a query that needs an answer quickly then the email address is support.vic@npl.com.au or support.sa@npl.com.au.
Posts do get missed, and I am not on this forum as much as I used to be.
Or you could post a topic then send a cordial note stating you would like a reply to this post to my email address.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
Conspiracy Theorist wrote:Garth Kay wrote:We ceased to operate events at this venue for reasons that were many.
The main reason is that it was an unsafe environment and our contractors and players did not feel 100% completely safe operating in this venue.
I played at the venue 4 out of the five weeks it operated and never once felt unsafe or uncomfortable.
If NPL felt that way about this venue then why was a new season allowed to begin?
CT
Your opinion or perception is incorrect. There were several issues with operating events at this venue. I will not discuss them on a public forum.
A new season was allowed to commence under the obligation and understanding from venue management that certain practices and attitudes would be changed.
They weren't. It also didn't help that this venue was defaulting on their account.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
bennymacca wrote:questions are definitely allowed, but you are implying that NPL stopped playing there just to screw you over
Where does he say that?
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
Conspiracy Theorist wrote:Really. Were you there? That was the most amount of money I have ever spent at an NPL event. And for what? Absolutely no chance of making the final through that venue, which, entertainment or not, we are all here to do.
Conspiracy Theorist wrote:I didnt say it was. But it is a disgrace. The venue only operated for total of 5 weeks.
CT
i took this to be having a go at NPL
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- ImAnAcehole9
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:54 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: 9ImAnAcehole
- Contact:
Re: Paparazzi Lounge
Risk VS Reward,
The risk was greater than the reward (by the sounds of it the reward was nothing!!) so what we should be saying is well done NPL for shutting down a tournament venue from an unsafe, unscrupulous and poorly run business.
A poorly run business takes risks themselves to make up for poor management.
For all you know that really nice beer battered fish & chips you were having to stamp up your Poker Passport was 4 week old chicken that was rancid enough to smell and be sold off as fish but deep fried just enough to kill the salmonella. (This is not factual, I have no evidence to support this statement.) Or as another example;
Management didn't provide sufficient crowd control for the venue to ensure NPL employee/s and customers were (at least some what) safe.
I say well done NPL for standing up against rogue management and providing a safe working environment for your employees, even when it does cost you a share in the market and a few dollars.
The risk was greater than the reward (by the sounds of it the reward was nothing!!) so what we should be saying is well done NPL for shutting down a tournament venue from an unsafe, unscrupulous and poorly run business.
A poorly run business takes risks themselves to make up for poor management.
For all you know that really nice beer battered fish & chips you were having to stamp up your Poker Passport was 4 week old chicken that was rancid enough to smell and be sold off as fish but deep fried just enough to kill the salmonella. (This is not factual, I have no evidence to support this statement.) Or as another example;
Management didn't provide sufficient crowd control for the venue to ensure NPL employee/s and customers were (at least some what) safe.
I say well done NPL for standing up against rogue management and providing a safe working environment for your employees, even when it does cost you a share in the market and a few dollars.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
